| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
tags, that's even possible with this concept, the vtags[] array needs to be modified during runtime for this -- the new code is quite experimental, ugly and needs polishing
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
those changes are necessary to get a decent multihead support) -- I renamed Monitor into View, to reflect in a better way the dwm terminology of the past
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
last patch
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
once for each monitor, so I applied this remark
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Xinerama and Multihead support (only Xinerama when enabled and present)
|
|
|
|
| |
polishing!
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
others also don't work with compiz, so it is Suns problem to provide a fix
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
compiz, hence I believe this might workaround the JDK 1.6+ XToolkit bug
|
| |
|